Human rights groups have sounded the alarm over Sri Lanka's proposed new anti-terrorism law, according to a report published by Dhaka Tribune on Friday. Critics argue that the draft legislation defines "terrorism" so broadly and vaguely that it invites arbitrary enforcement.

Concerns over the law's expansive scope

The proposed bill reportedly grants security forces extensive powers for searches and interrogations. Human rights organizations warn that such broad authority could undermine the fundamental freedoms of ordinary citizens and open the door to abuse of the law.

Critics point out that the ambiguity in defining terrorism raises the risk of the law being used to suppress political opponents or dissenting voices. They also noted Sri Lanka's history of misuse of emergency regulations and stringent laws in the past.

Position of human rights organizations

International and local human rights groups have already begun discussions over the draft of the new law. They have called on the government to reconsider certain provisions to ensure compliance with international human rights standards.

Analysts say that while effective measures against terrorism are necessary following the country's long civil war, such measures must be implemented with respect for the rule of law and human rights. The international community will be closely monitoring how the proposed law is applied in practice if it is passed by parliament.